This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] IPv6 only network at RIPE 68

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 only network at RIPE 68
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 only network at RIPE 68

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Philip Homburg pch-ripeml at u-1.phicoh.com
Sat May 17 11:46:23 CEST 2014

In your letter dated Sat, 17 May 2014 08:12:04 +0200 you wrote:
>The idea is to show that there is a middle way in which 
>you can build a network that still gives a good user experience but with far l
>ess stress on IPv4 resources.

I'm curious about this statement.

Is NAT464 over wifi or wired ethernet really easier than IPv6 native plus
NAT44?

I know NAT464 has advantages for 3G networks, but I have not seen anymore
doing a comparison for wifi. Does anyone have a pointer?

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 only network at RIPE 68
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 only network at RIPE 68

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]