This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] IPv6 only network at RIPE 68
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 only network at RIPE 68
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 only network at RIPE 68
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Ebersman
list-ripe-ipv6-wg at dragon.net
Fri May 16 15:02:58 CEST 2014
ayourtch> The choice for having a NAT64 was to provide a more gentle ayourtch> headstart, since a NAT64 has a strictly bigger set of ayourtch> apps/sites that do work. And, we felt that we should tread ayourtch> lightly - maximize the potential of actually using the v6only ayourtch> as a "business as usual" SSID. ayourtch> The "true IPv6-only" was a DNS server address away: e.g. you ayourtch> could temporarily hardcode the 2001:4860:4860::8888 for the ayourtch> tests, instead of the DNS64 local resolver address. I think that going for the most usable user experience (even if we have to do transition technologies for now) is best. However, I like the idea of having an IPv6 DNS server that isn't doing DNS64 that you can hard code if you want the true v6-only, no NAT experience.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 only network at RIPE 68
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 only network at RIPE 68
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]