This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Follow-Up on Niall's talk: Ramond (RA Monitoring Daemon)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Follow-Up on Niall's talk: Ramond (RA Monitoring Daemon)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Follow-Up on Niall's talk: Ramond (RA Monitoring Daemon)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fernando Gont
fgont at si6networks.com
Fri May 16 02:09:34 CEST 2014
On 05/15/2014 01:45 PM, Tim Chown wrote: >> >> In general, the "detection/reaction type of tools" (as opposed to a >> "prevention-oriented" security approach) haven't proven their >> usefullness too much in the past. > > The reason we knocked up RAmond was to handle accidental rogue RAs, > usually caused by Windows ICS at the time. I think we saw that over > the course of a year there was a rogue RA somewhere on our WLAN > around 50% of the time. So I would say it was very useful, for that > type of incident. Agreed. It's certainly useful for the non-attack case. -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont at si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Follow-Up on Niall's talk: Ramond (RA Monitoring Daemon)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Follow-Up on Niall's talk: Ramond (RA Monitoring Daemon)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]