This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] is use of IF-ID 0 "clean"
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] is use of IF-ID 0 "clean"
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] is use of IF-ID 0 "clean"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrew Yourtchenko
ayourtch at gmail.com
Sun Jun 22 15:31:38 CEST 2014
> On 21 Jun 2014, at 16:09, Benedikt Stockebrand <bs at stepladder-it.com> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko <ayourtch at gmail.com> writes: > >> Using all-zero IID forms a subnet-router anycast address: >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#section-2.6.1 >> >> Also, I've read about linux hosts responding to fe80:: if it is >> configured on any link on the router (though reads like a clear bug to >> me, and maybe fixed already). > > well, any router is supposed to listen on that anycast address, so > enabling that address when you turn on IPv6 forwarding does make some > sense. My sentence was about linux box not being a host.. But now that you mention it - sounds plausible that the folks I heard it from had linux host doing forwarding and forgot about it - makes sense indeed then and of course not a bug. --a > > > Cheers, > > Benedikt > > -- > Benedikt Stockebrand, Stepladder IT Training+Consulting > Dipl.-Inform. http://www.stepladder-it.com/ > > Business Grade IPv6 --- Consulting, Training, Projects > > BIVBlog---Benedikt's IT Video Blog: http://www.stepladder-it.com/bivblog/
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] is use of IF-ID 0 "clean"
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] is use of IF-ID 0 "clean"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]