This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] is use of IF-ID 0 "clean"
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] is use of IF-ID 0 "clean"
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] is use of IF-ID 0 "clean"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko
ayourtch at gmail.com
Fri Jun 20 19:54:22 CEST 2014
On 6/20/14, Wilfried Woeber <Woeber at cc.univie.ac.at> wrote: > Dear WG-folks, > > out of curiosity and because I got asked this question, here we go: > > Is the use of "0" as the interface ID in an IPv6 network "clean"? > I haven't found any indication that "0" is reserved (as in IPv4), or > should not be used, but there's a lingering feeling that it may cause > trouble, somewhere, somehow. Using all-zero IID forms a subnet-router anycast address: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#section-2.6.1 Also, I've read about linux hosts responding to fe80:: if it is configured on any link on the router (though reads like a clear bug to me, and maybe fixed already). --a > > Any input appreciated, tia, > Wilfried. > >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] is use of IF-ID 0 "clean"
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] is use of IF-ID 0 "clean"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]