This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] 96 more bits... time for some magic after all?

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 96 more bits... time for some magic after all?
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 96 more bits... time for some magic after all?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Piotr Strzyzewski Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Fri Oct 25 13:22:30 CEST 2013

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:37:00PM +0200, Shane Kerr wrote:
> Using bits in IPv6 networks for other purposes is orthogonal to those
> goals. 
> 
> What should we do about it?

Let's live with that? ;-)

Piotr

-- 
gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski
E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 96 more bits... time for some magic after all?
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 96 more bits... time for some magic after all?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]