This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Chown
tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tue May 28 14:13:15 CEST 2013
On 28 May 2013, at 13:00, "Jan Zorz @ go6.si" <jan at go6.si> wrote: > On 5/28/13 1:12 PM, MarcoH wrote: >> As was just discussing with Jan here in St Petersburg, I'm getting a bit confused about where we are heading. >> >> Do we still want to compile a list of errors and find a way to "attach" this to the 554 document as an errata? >> >> Or are we now gaining momentum to do a full revision and release a new document superseding 554? Which of course should incorporate all the fixes as well (and probably introduce some new mistakes) >> > This is a complex question now ;) > > I suggest that I make two lists - one with mistakes and errata material in another one with significant changes suggestions. > > For a quick fix we could process "errata" small changes and when the other list with bigger changes grows enough that we collectively decide we need a new version of the document - we go and change it. > > Would that work? That sounds good. Tim > > Cheers, Jan >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]