This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilhelm Boeddinghaus
wilhelm at boeddinghaus.de
Mon May 27 09:37:04 CEST 2013
Am 26.05.2013 23:10, schrieb Peter Koch: > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 08:50:05PM +0200, Wilhelm Boeddinghaus wrote: > >> anything in the document without getting a new RIPE document number. But >> having to many different versions of the document confuses our audience. > why is the audience less confused by the same number referencing different > content? > > -Peter > The audience for this document are the enterprises and public administration. They need help when they set up a tender. The vendors can live with changing document numbers, but not the enterprises and public administration. If major changes have to be made to the document we need a new number. This is also true for new sections or new RFCs. -Wilhelm
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE 554 Errata Page
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]