This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Measuring IPv6 Capability of RIPE Atlas Probes

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Measuring IPv6 Capability of RIPE Atlas Probes
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Measuring IPv6 Capability of RIPE Atlas Probes

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ole Troan ot at cisco.com
Wed Jun 12 21:09:26 CEST 2013

> -Is 10% really a representative figure or do RIPEatlas probes have a higher chance of living in some experimental (and potentially broken) network. 
> -Should there be some effort undertaken in finding the cause of this brokenness and getting it fixed.

I should certainly think so. wouldn't an email to a random set of the failing probe owners give us a clue?

> And ultimately, is there anything the IPv6 WG should or could do?

that would depend on what the problem is though.

cheers,
Ole

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Measuring IPv6 Capability of RIPE Atlas Probes
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Measuring IPv6 Capability of RIPE Atlas Probes

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]