This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Interest in IPv6-only world?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Interest in IPv6-only world?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Interest in IPv6-only world?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jason Fesler
jfesler at gigo.com
Wed Aug 7 03:10:33 CEST 2013
FYI, there is a wiki being used to track how things behave in the IPv6-only (and the NAT64) world; specifically focused on the case of hosts without *any* IPv4 at all. you're welcome to browse, and contribute. :-) Contribution does require a (moderated) login; but it's open to anyone who doesn't act like a spambot. http://wiki.test-ipv6.com/ On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Dan Luedtke <maildanrl at gmail.com> wrote: > I am running an IPv6-only network, but to be honest it is not yet > ready to to handle all my use cases. Often operating system updates > fail due to ipv4-only update servers. The equipment is all software, > the switch is openvswitch on a 12-NIC linux box from soekris, the > router is a linux box and most of the systems are linux systems. Thus > I am able to implement everything what I am missing in software. I do > not have to wait for vendors to implement a specific feature. The > downside of this is, that it quite slow. It works for small work > groups, but it would never scale up to enterprise environment. > > Dual Stack networks and NAT64 networks cost more money, so I see a > real business case for IPv6-only as soon as there are no bigger > business cases bound to ipv4 (like hundreds(!) of enterprise > applications that were in the stoneage of IT) > > Best regards > > Dan > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> wrote: >> All, >> >> I saw this today: >> >> http://wiki.test-ipv6.com/wiki/Main_Page >> >> And I was thinking about the seeming increase in interest recently in >> researching the realities of an IPv6-only world. >> >> According to Cisco's IPv6 stats site: >> >> http://6lab.cisco.com/stats/ >> >> We're a long way from having most content available over IPv6... but >> not *that* long, if we can take the 40% numbers seriously. >> >> So I guess this is mostly a "setting the groundwork" for now, but maybe >> not. Does anyone actually run an IPv6-only network now, or is thinking >> about it? (As in, without a gateway to the IPv4 world.) >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> Shane >> > > > > -- > Dan Luedtke > http://www.danrl.de > -- Jason Fesler, email/jabber <jfesler at gigo.com> resume: http://jfesler.com "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Interest in IPv6-only world?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Interest in IPv6-only world?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]