This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] route6: 2A00::/12
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] route6: 2A00::/12
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 6a44
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Tue Oct 30 15:17:24 CET 2012
On 10/30/12 8:54 AM, Antonio Prado wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On 10/26/12 2:44 PM, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: >> Sure? In majority of cases it would go where default route is pointing :) > > Anyway, it shouldn't :) In theory there is no difference between theory and reality. In reality, there is :) > >> Usually people accept default route at least from one upstream. You >> would be surprised, what percentage of IPv4 Internet (I suspect in IPv6 >> there is similar picture) runs on default routing - Randy did that >> experiment and can tell you the numbers ;) > > I remember those slides: unfortunately the percentage is high, but it's > not how DFZ is supposed to be, v4 or v6. Supposed to be. Agree :) Any idea how to solve that "routing misbehavior"? > > Back to the topic, I see that no one else cares for what traffic this > experiment is going to attract, if it's just noise or legitimate packets. I think this discussion was well in the topic as this issue can have considerable impact on the result of the experiment. Actually, this can drive the results in any direction. Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] route6: 2A00::/12
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 6a44
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]