This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] route6: 2A00::/12
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] route6: 2A00::/12
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] route6: 2A00::/12
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ivan Pepelnjak
ipepelnjak at gmail.com
Tue Oct 30 13:44:41 CET 2012
The way I understand how Internet works today, the "legitimate packets" would be either TCP SYN packets or DNS queries. What am I missing? Ivan > -----Original Message----- > From: ipv6-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:ipv6-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf > Of Antonio Prado > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 8:54 AM > To: ipv6-wg at ripe.net > Cc: Jan Zorz @ go6.si > Subject: Re: [ipv6-wg] route6: 2A00::/12 > > Hi Jan, > > On 10/26/12 2:44 PM, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > > Sure? In majority of cases it would go where default route is pointing > > :) > > Anyway, it shouldn't :) > > > Usually people accept default route at least from one upstream. You > > would be surprised, what percentage of IPv4 Internet (I suspect in > > IPv6 there is similar picture) runs on default routing - Randy did > > that experiment and can tell you the numbers ;) > > I remember those slides: unfortunately the percentage is high, but it's > not how DFZ is supposed to be, v4 or v6. > > Back to the topic, I see that no one else cares for what traffic this > experiment is going to attract, if it's just noise or legitimate packets. > > Thanks > -- > antonio >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] route6: 2A00::/12
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] route6: 2A00::/12
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]