[ipv6-wg] Last call on the replacement of ripe-501 "Requirements for IPv6 in ICT equipment"

On 10/21/11 10:01 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
> Tassos,
>
>> I noticed [I-D.ymbk-aplusp] on the list, which recently became RFC
>> 6346. Besides updating the list, do you find it appropriate to
>> include RFCs with experimental status?
>
> I think we should apply reasonable judgement.
>
> with regards to A+P, that's an architecture document. I don't
> understand how an implementation could support that. there are a
> number of A+P-ish solutions being worked on in the softwire wg. 4rd,
> dIVI and ds-lite + A+P. plus a general stateless address mapping
> document and DHCP option. these are the A+P solutions, but way too
> early to include any of this work. I do not think 6346 belongs in
> RIPE-501.

hey,

it's optional and covers everything you just said. Cool, is it? :)

>
>> Also 3484bis is still in draft.
>
> 3484bis fixes some real problems. hopefully it will be RFC before 501
> is out.

early november?

>
>> If we include drafts, then 6204 should also be changed to 6204bis.
>> Although i would prefer to have the final RFCs in.
>
> I have suggested to just shelf 6204bis until we have something to put
> in it. 501 already has the references to 6rd and ds-lite that 6204bis
> adds. so not needed.

+1

/jan