This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 501bis and some comments

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Job Snijders job at instituut.net
Thu Nov 3 10:39:13 CET 2011

Hi

On 2 nov. 2011, at 21:26, Fernando Gont wrote:

> On 11/01/2011 02:41 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> 
>>> Optional support:
>>> Revised ICMPv6 [RFC 5095] *
>> 
>> This seems wrong. Its not a revised ICMP spec, it is deprecation of RH0.
>> Draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis marks its as mandatory, and I think you
>> should too.
> 
> +1
> RH0 should be disabled by default.

I agree. To quote Joe Abley: "RH0 is evil". 

- Job

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 501bis and some comments

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]