This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Merike Kaeo
merike at doubleshotsecurity.com
Wed Nov 2 19:51:50 CET 2011
Hi. The authors agree here and the intent is to do a quick turnaround but to ensure we address the issues which we felt were important enough to resolve/incorporate. - merike On Nov 2, 2011, at 11:36 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > Marco, > > Just to clarify (because I wrote the e-mail yesterday in a hurry): I think the 501 work is very important, there's a lot of demand for it, and we should get it done ASAP. The world appreciates RIPE and the guys doing this work. That being said, I do agree that some of the issues that me and Jouni raised probably should be fixed before final publication. I'm hopeful that it can be done relatively quickly. > > Jari > >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]