This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Wed Nov 2 16:16:19 CET 2011
On 11/1/11 6:41 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: > Based on the discussion in the group today, I made a quick read of the > beginning parts of 501bis today at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/other-documents/requirements-for-ipv6-in-ict-equipment > Jari, hi. Thank you for getting involved, I'm sure your input will be very useful in additional crafting of this document. Also thnx to Eric Vyncke and Jouni Korhonen for equally important comments and suggestions. > I have to go to the social event now, will look at more things later. > But my overall conclusion is that the document still needs more review... Authors of the document changed our mind slightly, as we think at least this three comment-sets needs to be addressed before publishing the RIPE-501 replacement. We will try to collect as many input during this Last Call and try to address remaining issues after 10. November. We would like to fire up a discussion based on latest comments and find out if this are the changes we would like to make in existing draft. This is our suggestion, but we'll leave to the chairs to take it from here regarding procedure and all other stuff... Cheers, Merike, Sander and Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]