This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Test your connectivity for World IPv6 Day

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Martin Millnert millnert at gmail.com
Fri May 27 04:28:03 CEST 2011

Hi Gunter,

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
<gvandeve at cisco.com> wrote:
> GV> important is that host/user stations are on /64 bit length prefixes,
> the point-2-point's
> don't really matter actually in that case as they are just transport
> path and not a routing destination.

And there's no major technical reason I'm aware of why the NDP must be
used on p2p links at all. A router in theory need only figure out what
(p2p-) port to send a packet out on, and.. then do it. If there's only
one receiver connected, it's going to get the bits.

Not sure if vendors have NDP-less p2p-link features yet.

Regards,
Martin

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Test your connectivity for World IPv6 Day

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]