[ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links

On 5/26/11 8:19 PM, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
> Nice to hear Cisco has no problems with /127 (now I don't have to test it and blog about it ;)
>
> As for RIPE501bis - I would add RFC 6164 to the list of "optional" RFCs in the "Router requirements" section. Makes sense?
>
> Ivan
>
>> RIPE501Bis should imho be focused upon features for 'asking the right
>> IPv6 support'... asking
>> for /127 is silly I think... (btw Cisco IOS device's have no issue with
>> it at all
>> btw... so I am speaking here with my technology hat on).
>>
>> G/

Hehe, I see you two guys will have a lot to talk about at dinner after 
v6 summit here in Ljubljana on Thursday :)

ok, there is that draft document requested in RIPE-501, we need to 
change it to RFC6164 now, when it's published.

Thnx for a note :)

/jan