This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Announcement: RIPE NCC Training Courses
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jasper Jans Jasper.Jans at espritxb.nl
Thu May 26 10:07:39 CEST 2011

Can anyone give me some real world experience with IPv6 numbering on P2P links in their network?

I've seen the recommendations swing from '/64' to '/127 if your equipment can handle it' and even
to 'do not assign anything at all just use link-local' and access your devices over the loopback
which your IGP will distribute.

The last option seems interesting to me from a IP assignment point of few. It safes me having
to allocate a block for this part of the infrastructure. I'm just wondering if in the long run
it will not make life harder.

Jasper


Op dit e-mailbericht is een disclaimer van toepassing, welke te vinden is op http://www.espritxb.nl/disclaimer

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Announcement: RIPE NCC Training Courses
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]