This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] IPv6 filtering in an ISP environment
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 filtering in an ISP environment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 filtering in an ISP environment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pekka Savola
pekkas at netcore.fi
Wed May 18 16:23:33 CEST 2011
On Wed, 18 May 2011, Gert Doering wrote: > http://www.space.net/~gert/RIPE/ipv6-filters.html ... > <strong> Do not use these as-is without adaption to your local policies </> > > (PS: if I have missed any new netblocks that have different allocation > rules, plesae let me know) JunOS strict filter does not work. Longest prefix matching semantics of filters differs from Cisco. The 5 more specific ranges of 2001::/32 are rejected. Those need to be put in a separate term as a workaround. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 filtering in an ISP environment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 filtering in an ISP environment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]