This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

SV: [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...

• Previous message (by thread): SV: [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Sander Steffann sander at steffann.nl
Mon Jun 20 22:51:03 CEST 2011

Hi,

> A loadbalancer is a loadbalancer is a loadbalancer.....
> It should perform the same function in v6 as in in v4. So is there
> a definition on loadbalancers in general? Do we need to define
> what layer it´s working on?

I don't know... We might. If we are going to provide guidelines for tender initiators for buying load balancers, what useful guidelines can we provide? We provide a list of mandatory and optional RFCs for the other equipment, so which RFCs does a load balancer need to support?

- Sander

• Previous message (by thread): SV: [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]