[ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...

On 20 Jun 2011, at 10:53, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:

>> I think load balancers should be included; I know some universities who
>> did not take part in W6D not because their web servers couldn't be made v6
>> ready, but because their load balancers could not.
> 
> ... and some of us had to deploy NAT-PT on an obsolete router just to make 6-to-4 transition before hitting the 6-unaware LBs. Nasty.

Well, if that was your option, maybe better to not take part.  Though I hear a lot of sites did this.

>> Firewalls:
>> - surprised SeND is optional
> 
> How many people are deploying SeND? Even in DMZ?

Fair point. There are other ways to deploy a DMZ to help protect against the types of attack SeND can mitigate.

Tim