This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Us us at sweet-sorrow.com
Mon Jun 20 11:52:52 CEST 2011

5:0 please!


Us

On 06/20/2011 11:49 AM, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
> 4:0 for the short text.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of
>> Jan Zorz
>> Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 2:06 PM
>> To: ipv6-wg at ripe.net
>> Subject: Re: [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
>>
>> On 6/19/11 11:34 AM, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
>>> On a personal note: I agree with Ole, it is redundant to split it all up
>> and in the long run it could also lead to discrepancies between the two.
>> Stick with referring to 6104 and be done with it. Questions or comments on
>> the exact profile can be directed at the IETF, making it the same with the
>> references to 3Gpp.
>> Taken into account.
>>
>> 3:0 for short text.
>>
>> /jan
> 
>

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]