This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jan Zorz jan at pragma.si
Sun Jun 19 14:06:06 CEST 2011

On 6/19/11 11:34 AM, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
> On a personal note: I agree with Ole, it is redundant to split it all up and in the long run it could also lead to discrepancies between the two. Stick with referring to 6104 and be done with it. Questions or comments on the exact profile can be directed at the IETF, making it the same with the references to 3Gpp.
Taken into account.

3:0 for short text.

/jan

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New version (or followup) of RIPE-501 document...

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]