[ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2

If the equipment doesn't support IS-IS, then you can't expect it to support IS-IS MT ;)

Anyway, making IS-IS mandatory makes absolutely no sense; it's rarely used in Enterprise environments.

What we could do is to change the current requirement into "If the equipment supports IS-IS routing protocol, it MUST support IS-IS MT ..." (don’t cut/paste, use the wording from the document ;)

Ivan

> Currently, this is mandatory only "If MPLS Traffic Engineering is used
> in combination with IS-IS routing protocol"
> 
> What percentage of equipment we exclude as routers if we make this
> unconditionally mandatory?
> 
> I know for at least Mikrotik routers are excluded, as they do not
> support IS-IS at all (and they are quite used in small/medium companies
> environment).
> 
> Opinions?
> 
> Cheers, Jan