[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)

On 7/20/11 6:49 PM, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote:
> Idea...
>
> If you are LIR that had no clue and got /32 but now when you know that 
> you need more and can justify that, you could ask RIPE-NCC IPRA to get 
> back your original /32, start looking into your justification under 
> initial alloc policy and if you justify for anything up to (including) 
> /29, IPRA allocates you justified block starting exactly where 
> "returned" /32 started.
>
> Problem solved, no need to renumber.
>
> Do we need to put this into policy (if accepted) or would BCP work (as 
> this can be best current practice :) )?
...of course if /29 minimum initial allocation policy proposal change 
fails... (forgot to mention).

jan