[address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)

It looks like RIPE NCC does the same thing (assigning 1 block and
"reserving" the next three) with IPv6 PI blocks:

ripencc|CZ|ipv6|2001:67c:22d0::|48|20110531|assigned
ripencc|EU|ipv6|2001:67c:22d4::|48|20110531|assigned
ripencc|SI|ipv6|2001:67c:22d8::|48|20110601|assigned
ripencc|NL|ipv6|2001:67c:22dc::|48|20110601|assigned

Best regards,

Paul Hoogsteder
Breedband Delft/Meanie

> Download the "delegated-ripencc-extended-*" file from
> http://albatross.ripe.net/delegated-extended/
>
> cat delegated-ripencc-extended-20110718 | grep ipv6 | cut -d\| -f4,5,7 |
> sort | more
> *|19392
> 2001:1400::|32|allocated
> 2001:1401::|32|available
> 2001:1402::|31|available
> 2001:1404::|30|available
> 2001:1408::|32|allocated
> 2001:1409::|32|available
> 2001:140a::|31|available
> 2001:140c::|30|available
> 2001:1410::|32|allocated
> 2001:1411::|32|available
> 2001:1412::|31|available
> 2001:1414::|30|available
> 2001:1418::|32|allocated
> 2001:1419::|32|available
> 2001:141a::|31|available
> 2001:141c::|30|available
> 2001:1420::|32|allocated
>
> kix
>
>
>
>
>                    David Conrad
>                    <drc at virtualiz
>                    ed.org>                                            Para
>                    Enviado por:              Jasper Jans
>                    ipv6-wg-admin@            <Jasper.Jans at espritxb.nl>
>                    ripe.net                                             cc
>                                              ipv6-wg at ripe.net,
>                                              "address-policy-wg at ripe.net
>                    20/07/2011                Working Group"
>                    10:09                     <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
>                                                                     Asunto
>                                              Re: [address-policy-wg] RE:
>                                              [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6
>                                              allocation (ripe-512 issues)
>                                                              Clasificación
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 18, 2011, at 9:38 PM, Jasper Jans wrote:
>> The RIPE currently reserves a /29 for every initial /32.
>
> Is this really true?  When the RIRs and IANA were discussing the /12
> allocations, the RIRs claimed one of the reasons they needed /12s was
> because they would all be using the "bisection method" of allocation to
> remove the need for reservation. It would be sad to hear RIPE still hadn't
> followed through.
>
> Regards,
> -drc
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Mensaje analizado y protegido por Telefonica Grandes Clientes
>
>
>
>