This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ivan Pepelnjak ip at ioshints.info
Tue Jul 19 15:22:13 CEST 2011

Don't pull ND into this discussion. How do you make subnets smaller than /64 work on Ethernet links between Cisco routers?

SLAAC does depend on /64.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of
> Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 11:26 AM
> To: Ahmed Abu-Abed; RIPE IPv6
> Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: RE: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
> 
> You want to change how IPv6 SLAAC works? And ND?
> 
> G/

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]