[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)

[ address-policy-wg trimmed from Cc:]

On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 11:40 +0200, Sander Steffann wrote:
> 
> > On 7/19/11 11:16 AM, Ahmed Abu-Abed wrote:
> >> I think we will keep having having these issues until the minimum subnet
> >> assignment (outside point to point links) can be smaller than /64 which
> >> is an astronomical waste of public addresses for a home or business
> >> assignment.
> > 
> > Maybe it's me, but I really don't understand what are you talking about.
> > Can you please elaborate a bit on this?
> 
> Please take this off-list as this is out of scope for RIPE.

Actually, if people want to discuss this on the IPv6 working group list
I don't mind. The IPv6 list is quite open for all IPv6-related
discussions, whether they are related to RIPE or not. :)

Thanks!

--
Shane