[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:38:46AM +0200, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> I am sure that RIPE NCC is not the only interested party for the
> publication of an assignment-size attribute.

Interest != need. Publishing potentially sensitive data just because
people are "interested" is not a good enough reason in my book of data
protection principles.

Next time people ask for weekly updated fill-level: attributes in PD
pools so "interested" folks can "transparently" verify wether usage
levels are according to the rules that NCC enforces (and obtain further
business intelligence as a side effect, how convenient).

Anyway, as the proposal is in Last Call, I'll rest my case. I'm still
totally unconvinced that this a good idea.

Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0