[ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 04:07:42PM +0000, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
> > So, according to third point I can create inet6num object with /36 size
> > and status "AGGREGATED-BY-LIR" under my allocation, and then another
> > inet6num object with /37 size and status "AGGREGATED-BY-LIR" under this
> > bigger one and then another one and so on. There is nothing about two
> > levels less specific object. But maybe I don't understand this correctly.
> 
> You are righrt, it seems a bit strange ,without the policy that says only one level is allowed to it next to it (it's in another document). Please also take a look at the mail from Denis Walker on how the RIPE NCC will implement this and will be checking the grandparent object as well.

That explains everything. I support this proposal.

Piotr

-- 
gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski
E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl