[ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call

On Jan 26, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve) wrote:

>> <>
>> As an example, one would create <provider-tla>::/36 with an assignment
>> size of /56. A simple MRTG graph over time showing the actual number
> of
>> assignments or customers can then be generated from the OSS/BSS system
>> or maybe even directly from the DHCPv6 servers involved. This would
> then
>> satisfy the need to verify the addresses are used efficiently enough
> and
>> the LIR meets the HD ratio required. It does so in a way to which most
>> LIRs are already familiar and without the need to disclose to any
>> specific information on individual End Users or the resource they
> hold.
>> <>
>> 
>> GV> Not sure why this is here in the intro... it's a valid and usefull
>> anticipation, but I would place it somewhere else in the document as a
>> motivation example.
> 
> Forgive me for asking, are you commenting on the policy proposal itself
> or on one of the draft documents which will be the result of this ?
> 
> GV> I was just surprised to see an example in the intro section... it is
> not that I disagree with it, however it's a strange place to see an
> example mentioned.

It could have gone in the rationale, but then again it might be worth explaining it in the beginning. But be aware this is just the proposal, t's a form used in the process. This is not the resulting text, these are in the draft documents listed in the heading.

Marco
(as the proposer)