This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): SV: [ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
gvandeve at cisco.com
Wed Jan 26 11:10:57 CET 2011
I am new to this process.. so for me it saves more as the suggested 20 seconds :=-) G/ -----Original Message----- From: ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Jan Zorz @ go6.si Sent: woensdag 26 januari 2011 9:15 To: ipv6-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call On 1/26/11 8:28 AM, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 09:40:54PM -0800, David Kessens wrote: >> We have not received any input so far whether you support draft policy >> 2010-06. > Perhaps it's a good idea to at least mention the title of the policy > proposal in the "last call" announcements so that folks can quickly > check wether they might have an opinion to voice or not. Agree. On the other hand, it took me 20 seconds to find it. For everyone reference and help (saving 20 seconds): http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html /jan P.S: I support this proposal as-is.
- Previous message (by thread): SV: [ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]