This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Wed Jan 26 08:28:16 CET 2011
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 09:40:54PM -0800, David Kessens wrote: > We have not received any input so far whether you support draft policy > 2010-06. Perhaps it's a good idea to at least mention the title of the policy proposal in the "last call" announcements so that folks can quickly check wether they might have an opinion to voice or not. Just dropping a proposal number and expecting all readers to use their web browser to find out what this 1234-56 is all about does probably act as a factual barrier. I know it does for me, not being paid for following RIPE mailing lists in detail. Just a suggestion. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]