[ipv6-wg] "Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment" comment

Hello,

On 01/10/2011 12:10 AM, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote:
> On 9.1.2011 22:32, kzorba at otenet.gr wrote:
>>> If you did some stuff in that direction, can you send what you 
>>> extracted from
>>> other sections and in your opinion fits the CPE requirements.
>>>
>>
>> Since I am out of the office these days, I will get back to you with 
>> this in the
>> following days.
>> Another colleague gathered the requirements and we also consulted 
>> IETF documents
>> from what I know.
>

actually, the requirements were mostly gathered from 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-07 (haven't 
checked the diff with the new version yet). I agree with Marco and 
others about using the IETF doc as reference but I'm not sure if there's 
much of a point in making a RIPE document that basically points to the 
IETF draft.

<snip>
> I'm still thinking and need a discussion first with authors and see 
> what community thinks - but pointing to RFC or draft is ok for us, we 
> know how to read RFC and so on - problem is when somebody writes a 
> tender for buying ICT equipment - in this case going to read RFC or 
> draft or something might be quite complicated for some people.
>
> Not sure yet, do we just point to Ole's draft (that is excellent imho) 
> or do we write a list of mandatory RFCs that are 1:1 in sync with the 
> draft and BBF paper (Ole is also editing that) and keep the list in 
> sync if draft/RFC changes. This way tender initiator can just 
> copy/paste RFCs and this way the job is easy.
>

that last proposal makes sense to me

> Any thoughts?
>
> Cheers, Jan
>
>
cheers,
Yannis