[ipv6-wg] "Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment" comment

Quoting "Jan Zorz @ go6.si" <jan at go6.si>:

> On 8.1.2011 12:11, kzorba at otenet.gr wrote:
>> Greetings to all and happy new year.
>>
>> We also used this document to extract basic features (in our environment)
>> for customer CPEs.
>> In my opinion, the "document" format must be preserved as a single  
>> place to contain the entire information. I guess 'if' statements  
>> like Jan mentions is one way to achieve the desired outcome.
>
> Kostas, hi.
>

Hi Jan,

> If you did some stuff in that direction, can you send what you  
> extracted from other sections and in your opinion fits the CPE  
> requirements.
>

Since I am out of the office these days, I will get back to you with  
this in the following days.
Another colleague gathered the requirements and we also consulted IETF  
documents from what I know.

> All ideas and preliminary draft texts helps to go forward with the 501 doc.
>

 From what I understood in the discussions of the thread, the idea  
will be to provide pointers in the 501 doc to IETF documents, right?  
Some people expressed concerns that the RIPE document should not  
duplicate IETF work or come up with any sort of differences.
Of course the 501 doc is not any form of standard, just some work that  
will help in moving IPv6 deployment a bit closer...

> Regards, Jan
> P.S: Did we met in Athens at v6 TF meeting last summer?
>

Yes ;-)

Regards,

Kostas