This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Us
us at sweet-sorrow.com
Sat Dec 24 13:10:41 CET 2011
On 12/24/2011 12:57 PM, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > * Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke at cisco.com> [2011-12-23 17:32]: >> Jan, >> >> Let's be realistic (and the best quality of RIPE-501++ is to be >> realistic and 'down to the ground'): very few IPv6-nodes do IPsec... >> So, let's remove this requirement and make it optional (RFC 6434 >> clearly shows the path). > > +1 > > Happy Holidays! > > Sebastian > I'd have to +1 this also. Especially because of already mentioned low power devices (phones and tablets and such) Even though it would be nice to have it. Ragnar Belial Us
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]