This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Announcement: RIPE NCC Training Courses
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yannis Nikolopoulos
dez at otenet.gr
Tue Aug 23 15:50:53 CEST 2011
On 07/27/2011 10:01 PM, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > On 7/27/11 3:02 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I will like to know, from those deploying IPv6 services to residential >> customers, if you are planning to provide static or dynamic IPv6 >> prefixes. > > static. no questions asked :) > > people should stop thinking with IPv4 minds, specially when designing > big IPv6 networks (in multiple wrong and horrible IPv4 ways) > > Cheers, Jan > > In our ipv6 broadband trials, we've tested both static and dynamic scenarios. We're gearing towards a static model that is not "roaming", i.e the users will somehow be bound by their location. This way, we'll be able to aggregate customer ranges per terminating device. cheers, Yannis p.s.: I need to check the data but I'm pretty sure that we didn't experience major delays in our dynamic trials when a new prefix was assigned to an end user.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Announcement: RIPE NCC Training Courses
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]