[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments): discussion in the IPv6-WG mailing list

Oh and could people at least cross-post ?

On 3 sep 2010, at 21:13, Marco Hogewoning wrote:

> 
> On 3 sep 2010, at 17:30, Sander Steffann wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>>>> A new policy proposal, 2010-06, "Registration Requirements for IPv6 End
>>>> User Assignments", was published to the IPv6 Working Group mailing list today.
>>> 
>>> I think I like this policy, mostly.
>>> 
>>> The only issue I have is that it appears to mandate that all assignments makes from a SUB-ASSIGNED PA block are exactly the length specified.  This means that if the ISP has policies of, say,  /56 for most customers but /48 for some, while at the same time wanting to implement some form of per-PoP prefix aggregation, it means assigning multiple blocks per aggregation point, one per assignment size.
>> 
>> Allowing multiple "assignment-size:" fields might solve that.
> 
> No it won't, you have a /40 with assignment size /56 and /64 and then how to specify which customer has what. Can't we solve this by allowing more specifics ?
> 
> The original thought was to just create multiple entries, one for each assignment size. But we could allow for something like:
> 
> bla:://40 -> assignment size /48
> bla::1/48 -> assignment size /56 
> 
> MarcoH
> 

MarcoH