This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Thu Sep 2 15:34:22 CEST 2010
On 2 sep 2010, at 15:20, Bertrand Yvain wrote: > On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 03:34:22PM +0200, Emilio Madaio wrote: >> A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for >> discussion. > [...] >> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html > > In section 4.0: > > * The value of the "assignment-size:" attribute must be less than the > size of the object's bit mask. > > should read: > > * The value of the "assignment-size:" attribute must be more than the > length of the object-s bit mask. > > It could also be precised as "strictly more" for the equal case is > trivial/useless. Nice one indeed will pick this up on the second revision... Groet, MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]