This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] New draft document available: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New draft document available: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New draft document available: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
João Damas
joao at bondis.org
Fri Oct 8 10:41:32 CEST 2010
On 8 Oct 2010, at 10:11, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > Joao hi, > > Thnx for comments. Please see my thoughts inline. > > On 7.10.10 11:11, João Damas wrote: > >> Apple is an organisation. It does not take decisions. People at Apple do. In >> this case, you need to talk to Stuart Cheshire. > > Anyone knows or have contact with Stuart Cheshire @Apple? Stuart Cheshire <cheshire at apple.com> is his public address. > > This is meant to work on switch ports level. You declare "router" port and let RA packets go through only on that physical port, "snooping" for RA pachets in the switch and blocking RA packets on all ather ports... > yep, I was tricked by the wording in the original text. Perhaps that is the part that need a bit of work? Joao
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New draft document available: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New draft document available: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]