This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] New draft document available: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New draft document available: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New draft document available: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jan Zorz @ go6.si jan at go6.si
Fri Oct 8 10:12:17 CEST 2010

On 7.10.10 16:30, Gert Doering wrote:
>> how is a host-based mechanism based on prevention of outgoing
>> packets ever going to work? I mean, it can prevent accidents (perhaps,
>> it is not a guarantee, look at usual list of ad-hoc Wifi SSIDs at
>> any event) but it sure won't prevent intentional unauthorised RAs.
>
> RA-guard is not host-based but switch-based.  You configure the switch
> "*this* is the port where the router lives" and RAs on all other ports
> are filtered.
>
> See draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-*.txt
>
> Gert Doering

Exacty :)

+1

/jan

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New draft document available: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New draft document available: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]