This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101123) on changes: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101123) on changes: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101123) ended

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ivan Pepelnjak ip at ioshints.info
Sat Nov 20 19:21:38 CET 2010

> Thanks for commenting. Looking at the tekst you are right that there is
> some redundancy in the text, but it's not a conflict and it does not
> create ambiguity. The underlying message stays the same "If you need MPLS,
> you need RFC 4798".
> 
> Procedural I would like to publish as is instead of going into another
> cycle of editing and last call [...]
>
> [...] I suggest we collect the
> editorial comments and fix them in a future version.
> 
> Ivan, are you ok with this ?

Absolutely (and I totally agree with & support your reasons).

Although the two bullets overlap, they do not contradict each other and having them both is not harmful. Let's get this done.

Ivan

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101123) on changes: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101123) ended

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]