[ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

On 9.11.10 3:56, Mohsen Souissi wrote:
> I support this document to be published. Good work, well done.
>
> Some suggestions:
>
> - RFC 2461 (2 occurrences) to be replaced by RFC 4861?
> - RFC 2462 (1 occurrence) to be replaced by RFC 4862

Hi,

fixed, thnx for head up. Will be visible in next version of the draft.

> What about load balancers, these types of equipment can hardly fit in
> the categories defined (if I'm correct). Yet they might be a pain in
> termes ov v6-v4 functional and performance parity.

This document is intended to be published as BCP and we can add/change things 
also later, after publication. I agree load balancers hardly fit in any 
category, but we had to stop expanding the complexity at some point :)

If we find approach how to specify that without adding more complexity, we can 
add that later, if community will agree on that.

thnx, /jan