This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Tue Nov 9 09:49:28 CET 2010
On 9.11.10 9:39, Us wrote: > I think this is a bit redundant. It reads as "if you need, you must have > it". Yes. For example a car. Car must have some basic functionality, that is mandatory. Now, if you want to do some additional stuff with your car, you need to require that and when you require that it becomes mandatory. It's mandatory, that car moves on the road. If you need to carry bigger load, then you require the car to be a bit different. Still a car, but with mandatory functions that you need for your job, like a big booth or something. If you don't require a functionality it is not mandatory. /jan
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]