[ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

Le 10-11-09 02:02, Jan Zorz @ go6.si a écrit :
> On 8.11.10 11:31, Marc Blanchet wrote:
>> does not make sense to me.
>>
>> 6PE and 6VPE are two ways to run IPv6 over MPLS network, but are not
>> the only
>> ones. Therefore, it can not be mandatory.
>
> Marc, hi :)
>
> Did not know you are on this list :) :)

well, I've been here probably since the existence of the ripe ipv6 wg... 
We have been more active when we were working on the update of the RPSL 
(RPSLng) since we started that work a while ago and RPSLng was mostly 
discussed in RIPE...

>
> What do you suggest? Re-wording, add additional mechanisms or move it to
> optional section?

my only point is the "mandatory" part. s/must/may|should consider/...

Marc.

>
> Basically it is written "If requested by tender initiator...", that
> makes it as a choice...
>
> /jan


-- 
=========
IPv6 book: Migrating to IPv6, Wiley. http://www.ipv6book.ca
Stun/Turn server for VoIP NAT-FW traversal: http://numb.viagenie.ca
DTN Implementation: http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64-DNS64 Opensource: http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca