[ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

Le 10-11-09 02:44, Isacco Fontana a écrit :
> Hi Marc,
> your issue is true about IPv4 only backbone....but today for ISP with
> MPLS backbone the 6PE and 6VPE are used to deploy ipv6 on MPLS backbone.

I know (and have been helping providers to deploy 6PE and 6VPE). My 
point is to make it "mandatory" is the issue.

Marc.

>
> Isacco
>
>
> Marc Blanchet ha scritto:
>> Le 10-11-08 18:15, Jan Zorz @ go6.si a écrit :
>>> On 8.11.10 10:00, Isacco Fontana wrote:
>>>> 6VPE (RFC 4659)
>>>> 6PE (RFC 4798)
>>>>
>>>> These RFC are related to MPLS environment so I think 6PE and 6VPE
>>>> should be
>>>> mandatory for ISP that are using MPLS and offer ipv6 for direct
>>>> internet
>>>> connections and 6VPE for ipv6 over vpn mpls services.
>>>
>>> So, the correct wording inside mandatory section would be:
>>>
>>> - if IPv6 over MPLS and IPv6 over VPN MPLS features are requested, 6PE
>>> or 6VPE must be supported [RFC4798, RFC4659] The contracting authority
>>> shall specify the required protocol.
>>
>> does not make sense to me.
>>
>> 6PE and 6VPE are two ways to run IPv6 over MPLS network, but are not
>> the only ones. Therefore, it can not be mandatory.
>>
>> Marc.
>>
>>>
>>> Is this acceptable?
>>>
>>> Thnx, Jan Zorz
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
=========
IPv6 book: Migrating to IPv6, Wiley. http://www.ipv6book.ca
Stun/Turn server for VoIP NAT-FW traversal: http://numb.viagenie.ca
DTN Implementation: http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64-DNS64 Opensource: http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca