This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jan Zorz @ go6.si jan at go6.si
Mon Nov 8 19:02:29 CET 2010

On 8.11.10 11:31, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> does not make sense to me.
>
> 6PE and 6VPE are two ways to run IPv6 over MPLS network, but are not the only
> ones. Therefore, it can not be mandatory.

Marc, hi :)

Did not know you are on this list :) :)

What do you suggest? Re-wording, add additional mechanisms or move it to 
optional section?

Basically it is written "If requested by tender initiator...", that makes it as 
a choice...

/jan

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]