This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jan Zorz @ go6.si jan at go6.si
Mon Nov 8 11:15:55 CET 2010

On 8.11.10 10:00, Isacco Fontana wrote:
> 6VPE (RFC 4659)
> 6PE (RFC 4798)
>
> These RFC are related to MPLS environment so I think 6PE and 6VPE should be
> mandatory for ISP that are using MPLS and offer ipv6 for direct internet
> connections and 6VPE for ipv6 over vpn mpls services.

So, the correct wording inside mandatory section would be:

- if IPv6 over MPLS and IPv6 over VPN MPLS features are requested, 6PE or 6VPE 
must be supported [RFC4798, RFC4659] The contracting authority shall specify the 
required protocol.

Is this acceptable?

Thnx, Jan Zorz

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]