This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] "IPv6 Ripeness" measurements on RIPE Labs
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] "IPv6 Ripeness" measurements on RIPE Labs
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] "IPv6 Ripeness" measurements on RIPE Labs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
McTim
dogwallah at gmail.com
Sat May 29 11:50:44 CEST 2010
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Ahmed Abu-Abed <ahmed at tamkien.com> wrote: > Hi Mirjam, > > One suggestion, which should increase awareness on the good Ripeness > initiative and its importance, is to measure on a country basis the IPv4 > rate of consumption, or v4's 'Witherness' , and this can use historical data > that RIPE has already. For example, the number v4 addresses being reserved > per year on a country basis can be presented over the past 5 year period, > and LIRs can use this data to know when v6 readiness has to happen. IIRC, there is no "reservation per country" in IPv4 (or v6). It's one pool, not one pool of adddresses per country. -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] "IPv6 Ripeness" measurements on RIPE Labs
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] "IPv6 Ripeness" measurements on RIPE Labs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]